There is a point of agreement here. My ancestry is Sri Lankan Tamil, but I do not consider Sri Lanka my ‘homeland’ (I have never been there). Anyone claiming to be British cannot simultaneously advocate for another country. Whether that is Lammy pushing for reparations, or MPs campaigning for airports in Pakistan, or councillors running for office in Bangladesh. To be British is to be exclusively loyal to these islands and its heritage. It is natural for people to admire the country of their anc

📌 Disclaimer | This is not an Amazigh woman nor is she a representative of the North African idigenous population prior to foreign migrations and even post-migrations according to the study made in 2023 where this skeleton was excavated it states that this woman (SKH001) had an ancestry which composed 76% Levant Natufian DNA and only 23,6% North african IBEROMAURUSIAN ancestry . today , the highest amounf of Natufian DNA found in Northwestern africa is around 40% in some places where Arab tribe

Former PM @JustinTrudeau says the secret to immigration isn't the numbers. It's the capacity to integrate newcomers.He argues countries should be defined by shared values, not shared ancestry.

How to Share AncestryDNA Results

DNA Test - Uncover Your Ethnic Origins & Ancestry - MyHeritage

Genetic distances of a Maeotian (mercenary?) found in Sicily in 480 BCENote that genetic distance is not synonymous with ancestry. The main reason Circassians are not closest to the Maeotian is that Circassians received additional minor East Asian ancestry from steppe peoples that Northeast Caucasians have less of.

Here is the thing. What I'm wearing on my profile picture is a late 15th century arming doublet based on the painting by Piero della Francesca, Tuscany. It's a connection to my Medieval Italian ancestors. So In THEORY I would have nothing against someone wearing a traditional item of clothing to connect with their ancestry, whatever that may be. But what he is wearing is not a traditional Polynesian skirt is it? So I'm confused, is this ACTUALLY about ancestry and re-enactment (nothing wrong) or

BC is discriminating against park goers based on their ancestry. This “Reconciliation” grift has gone way too far. Is this even legal?

No steppe ancestry in India till 1000 BCE. Also same as Narasimhan